Important: Being asked for a "protected conversation" does not mean you have to accept any offer, resign, or sign anything. You have the right to take time to consider your position and take legal advice before responding.
What is a protected conversation (section 111A ERA 1996)?
A protected conversation is a specific legal mechanism introduced by section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It allows an employer to have a frank discussion with an employee about ending the employment relationship — and to make an offer of a settlement agreement — without that conversation being used as evidence in an unfair dismissal claim if negotiations fail.
The purpose is commercial practicality. Before section 111A was introduced in 2013, employers faced a dilemma: if they approached an underperforming employee to discuss a managed exit and the employee refused, they could not safely have had that conversation without it potentially being used against them in subsequent tribunal proceedings. Section 111A created a "safe harbour" for those discussions in the context of ordinary unfair dismissal claims.
Key features of a protected conversation under section 111A:
- It can be initiated by either party — you can ask your employer for a protected conversation just as they can ask you
- It does not require any pre-existing dispute — unlike the without prejudice rule (see below), it applies even where there is no existing dispute
- Protection applies only in relation to ordinary unfair dismissal claims
- If there is no improper behaviour by either party, the conversation and any offer made cannot be referred to in tribunal proceedings
Without prejudice vs. protected conversation — the key differences
These two concepts are often confused — sometimes deliberately — but they work differently and protect different things. Understanding the distinction matters for how you approach any offer your employer makes.
| Factor | Without Prejudice | Protected Conversation (s.111A) |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | Common law and evidence rules | Section 111A Employment Rights Act 1996 |
| When it applies | Where there is an existing dispute between the parties | Even where there is no existing dispute |
| Claims covered | All civil claims, including discrimination | Ordinary unfair dismissal only |
| Improper behaviour exception | Yes — undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation | Yes — statutory definition includes threats, harassment, discrimination |
| Can either party initiate? | Yes | Yes |
| Does labelling it "without prejudice" make it so? | No — substance determines admissibility | No — section 111A requires no label; protection is automatic if conditions met |
The critical practical difference is this: if your employer says something during a protected conversation that amounts to discrimination — for example, telling you that you are being managed out because of your age or because you raised a protected disclosure — that conversation is not protected against a discrimination or whistleblowing claim, even if it is protected against an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. Section 111A does not shield discriminatory or unlawful conduct from scrutiny in the relevant tribunal proceedings.
What can be discussed in a protected conversation?
The purpose of a protected conversation is to facilitate open negotiation about a settlement. Within that scope, almost any topic related to the terms of a potential departure can be raised. Common topics include:
- The employer's view of the employee's performance, conduct, or fit — raised as context for the offer, not as findings in a formal process
- The financial terms of a proposed settlement — ex-gratia payment, notice pay, redundancy pay
- The tax treatment and structure of the payment
- The proposed termination date and notice period
- Reference wording and how the departure will be described
- Post-termination restrictions and whether they will be enforced or modified
- The timeline for the employee to consider and respond to any offer
Employers using the ACAS Code of Practice guidance on settlement agreements are expected to give the employee a minimum of 10 calendar days to consider any written settlement proposal — and should not pressure employees into accepting faster. This is not a strict legal requirement but is best practice, and courts take it seriously when assessing whether conduct was appropriate.
What CANNOT be said in a protected conversation
Section 111A expressly states that the protection does not apply if there has been improper behaviour by either party. ACAS guidance gives examples of conduct that crosses the line:
- Threats: Telling an employee that if they do not sign the settlement agreement, they will be dismissed or subjected to formal disciplinary proceedings. This is a threat — it puts improper pressure on the employee and removes the voluntariness that makes the conversation legitimate.
- Undue pressure: Demanding an immediate answer, refusing to give time to consider, insisting on a decision "by the end of today," or making the employee feel they have no choice.
- Harassment or intimidation: Aggressive or bullying language, emotional manipulation, humiliating the employee in front of colleagues.
- Discrimination: Any statement that connects the offer to a protected characteristic — making it clear that the managed exit is because of age, disability, pregnancy, race, religion, or any other Equality Act ground.
- Misleading the employee: Giving false information about the legal position, the strength of any case against them, or the consequences of refusing to accept the offer.
Warning: If your employer suggests you will be dismissed or subjected to a disciplinary process if you do not accept the offer — and that suggestion is intended to pressure rather than inform — this may constitute improper behaviour that removes the protection entirely. Note it down immediately after the meeting.
What happens if there is improper behaviour?
If the employer engages in improper behaviour during a protected conversation, the protection provided by section 111A falls away. This means:
- The entire conversation — including any offer made, any admissions by the employer, and any pressure applied — can potentially be introduced as evidence in tribunal proceedings
- For ordinary unfair dismissal claims, the tribunal can hear the full conversation and draw inferences from what was said
- For discrimination and other automatically unfair dismissal claims (where section 111A never applied), the content of the conversation has always been potentially admissible
The admissibility question is decided by the tribunal as a preliminary matter. You will need to give evidence of what was said, which is why contemporaneous notes (taken immediately after the meeting) are so valuable. The more specific and detailed your record of what was said and how it was said, the stronger your argument that the conversation should be admitted into evidence.
Even if the conversation is admitted, this does not automatically mean you win your claim. But the content of the meeting — particularly threats, discriminatory remarks, or admissions about the real reason for the exit — can be highly influential on the outcome.
How to respond to an unexpected protected conversation offer
Being called into a meeting and unexpectedly told that your employer wants to discuss a "settlement" or a "mutual parting of ways" is a disorienting experience. Most employees are caught completely unprepared. Here is how to handle it:
- Stay calm and do not commit to anything. You are not required to respond to any offer in the meeting itself. Listen, ask for any written proposal to be provided to you, and say you need time to consider.
- Ask whether you can bring a companion. You do not have a strict legal right to bring a companion to a settlement discussion (unlike a disciplinary hearing), but you can ask — and the employer's willingness or refusal is itself informative.
- Take notes. If permitted, take notes during the meeting. If not, write down everything that was said as soon as you leave. Date and time your notes.
- Request the offer in writing. Tell the employer you would like any offer set out in writing, including the proposed payment, the claims being waived, and the timeline. This is your right and is standard practice.
- Do not sign anything. Do not sign a settlement agreement in the meeting or within a day or two of receiving it. The law requires you to have taken independent legal advice from a qualified solicitor before the agreement is valid — use that requirement to give yourself time.
- Take legal advice promptly. Contact an employment solicitor as quickly as possible. Many offer a free initial consultation. The 10-day consideration period under ACAS guidance exists precisely to allow you to do this.
Should you sign a settlement agreement after a protected conversation?
Whether to sign depends entirely on the terms on offer and your own circumstances — not on the fact that the conversation took place. Being offered a settlement agreement via a protected conversation is not, in itself, a sign that you are in a weak position or must accept what is offered.
Questions to consider before deciding:
- Is the financial offer fair, taking into account your notice entitlement, any accrued benefits, and the potential value of any claims you are being asked to waive?
- Are you being asked to waive valuable claims — discrimination, whistleblowing, breach of contract — that are worth more than the offer?
- What does the reference agreement say, and is it acceptable?
- Are the post-termination restrictions reasonable, or are they being extended or strengthened as a condition of the settlement?
- Do you actually want to leave, or would you prefer to address the underlying issues and stay?
Remember: you can counter-negotiate. A settlement offer is a starting position, not a final answer. Your solicitor can help you formulate a counter-proposal.
Tactical tips — recording, note-taking, asking for time
Practical steps that protect your position throughout a protected conversation process:
- Recording conversations: Covert recording of workplace conversations is a legally complex area. Such recordings may be admissible in tribunal proceedings in certain circumstances, but their use can also damage your credibility or trigger counterclaims. If you are considering recording a meeting, take legal advice before doing so.
- Written notes are usually sufficient: A detailed contemporaneous written note — created immediately after the meeting, noting what was said by whom, in what tone, and in what order — is generally sufficient evidence of what occurred. Write it up the same day.
- Ask for written confirmation of the timeline: If your employer gives you a deadline to respond, ask for that in writing. An unreasonable deadline is itself evidence of undue pressure.
- Do not discuss the offer with colleagues: Settlement discussions are confidential. Breaching that confidentiality could undermine your position and potentially expose you to breach of contract claims.
- Your employer pays your legal fees: Under the settlement agreement process, it is standard practice for the employer to make a contribution to your legal costs — typically £250 to £500 plus VAT. Confirm this in writing before instructing a solicitor, and check that the contribution is sufficient to cover the advice you need.
Next step: If a settlement agreement has been offered, use our Settlement Agreement Calculator to assess whether the financial terms are fair — including the tax treatment and how the offer compares to what a tribunal might award.